Three digital experiments applying structured, multi-perspective AI intelligence to the most consequential questions on the planet.
A conservation strategy tool. A diagnostic platform that makes proven knowledge reusable. A conviction market where every wager funds the fight. Each one built on the same architecture: orchestrating genuine intellectual conflict between research-grounded perspectives to surface what a single answer misses.
Three experiments
Bring a conservation decision, not just a question. Hand it your budget, your unit costs and the levers you can move — up to 12 research-grounded models of Earth interrogate them, each with different ecological assumptions, policy frameworks and philosophies. Not one answer. A council.
The collision surfaces what each perspective sees and misses: where the Earths independently agree (that's signal), where they split on a named assumption (that's your strategic choice point), and the outlier insight that almost got lost (that's how you prevent catastrophic surprise). Then quantify it — the worldviews supply the parameters, reviewed code computes the spread.
15 pre-built Earths
Bring your budget. Get the spread, not a point estimate.
A live web app, invite-only — built for strategy meetings, workshops, and field teams.
Every impact organization has decades of knowledge locked in project reports, evaluations, and institutional memory — with no systematic way to apply it to the next opportunity. Stencils operationalizes that knowledge.
Upload your success — and failure — stories. The platform distills the conditions that actually made each intervention work into matchable patterns. Then assess any new context, from a single community to a portfolio of countries, to diagnose whether the conditions for success are present, absent, or buildable — for conservation, public health, science, or planning alike.
Diagnostic, not predictive
Not "what's in this place" — but "does this place match what's worked." A funder can allocate based on enabling condition fit. An implementing org can stress-test a theory of change before committing resources.
Stencil commons: organizations contribute patterns, the network effect grows. Failure modes encoded alongside successes.
The scoreboard for the planet. Build your version of Earth, stake your world-model, and compete against today's news — science questions, geopolitical events, and climate data all feed the score in real time.
Like Polymarket for the planet — except your wager isn't just a prediction, it's a position. Money wagered pushes perspectives. News stories and questions from science and the world go up; people take sides on which outcome wins. The board moves with climate, weather, and live data.
Every transaction fee. Every wager. 80% goes directly to conservation efforts — the game funds the fight.